UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Tradeweb Markets Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

		Lee Olesky                    Chief Executive Officer and                    Chairman of the Board                    Tradeweb Markets Inc.

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Tradeweb Markets Inc., which will be held virtually at 12:30 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 10, 2022, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TW2022.

The attached Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describes the formal business that we will transact at the virtual Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors of Tradeweb Markets Inc. has determined that a vote for Items 1 and 2 and against Item 3 is in the best interest of Tradeweb Markets Inc. and its stockholders and unanimously recommends such a vote at the Annual Meeting.

We have elected to take advantage of the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that allow us to furnish our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), rather than a full paper set of the proxy materials, unless you previously requested to receive printed copies. The Notice contains details regarding the date, time and location of the meeting and the business to be conducted, as well as instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet and for voting over the Internet.

Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares promptly by following the voting instructions that you have received. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Voting by proxy will not prevent you from voting virtually at the Annual Meeting, but will assure that your vote is counted if you cannot virtually attend.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and the employees of Tradeweb Markets Inc., we thank you for your continued support and look forward to seeing you at the virtual Annual Meeting.

Sincerely yours,

Lee Olesky

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

March 28, 2022

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Tradeweb Markets Inc. (“Tradeweb” or the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held virtually at 12:30 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 10, 2022, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TW2022 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Our principal offices are located at 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. This Proxy Statement is first being made available to our stockholders on or about March 29, 2022. The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual meeting” of stockholders. You are invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, you do not need to virtually attend the meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card if you received paper copies of the proxy materials, or follow the instructions below to submit your proxy over the Internet.

Outstanding Securities and Quorum

Only holders of record of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock (each such designation having par value $0.00001 per share) at the close of business on March 14, 2022, the record date, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On that date, we had 107,246,495 shares of Class A common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, 96,933,192 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, 1,654,825 shares of Class C common stock outstanding and entitled to vote and 28,325,833 shares of Class D common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Holders of outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock vote together as a single class on all matters on which stockholders are entitled to vote generally (except as may be required by law).

Each share of Class A common stock and Class C common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters presented to the Company’s stockholders generally. Each share of Class B common stock and Class D common stock entitles its holder to ten votes on all matters presented to the Company’s stockholders generally. The holders of Class C common stock and Class D common stock have no economic interests in the Company (where “economic interests” means the right to receive any dividends or distributions, whether cash or stock, in connection with common stock). These attributes are summarized in the following table:

All of the shares of our outstanding Class B common stock are currently held by an indirect subsidiary (the “Refinitiv Direct Owner”) of Refinitiv Parent Limited (“Refinitiv”). Until January 29, 2021, Refinitiv was indirectly controlled by (i) certain investment funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. (f/k/a The Blackstone Group L.P.) (“Blackstone”), (ii) an affiliate of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, (iii) an affiliate of GIC Special Investments Pte. Ltd. and (iv) certain co-investors (collectively, the “Investor Group”), which collectively indirectly held a 55% ownership interest in Refinitiv, and Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”), which indirectly held a 45% ownership interest in Refinitiv. On January 29, 2021, the London Stock Exchange Group plc (“LSEG”) closed a transaction with the Investor Group and Thomson Reuters to acquire the Refinitiv business. Following the consummation of such transaction, LSEG became the controlling shareholder of Refinitiv, and Refinitiv continues to be the controlling stockholder of Tradeweb, holding approximately 88.1% of the combined voting power of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock. LSEG has advised us that it intends to vote all such shares for the election of each of the nominees to the Board named herein and the ratification

of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, and against the stockholder proposal relating to the adoption of a policy on board diversity.

A majority of the voting power of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock entitled to vote, present virtually or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

We are furnishing proxy materials to some of our stockholders via the Internet by mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials directs stockholders to a website where they can access our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our combined Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Report”), and view instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and would prefer to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you elect to receive our future proxy materials electronically, you will receive access to those materials via e-mail unless and until you elect otherwise.

Proxy Voting

Shares that are properly voted via the Internet or by telephone or for which proxy cards are properly executed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given or, in the absence of directions, will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows: “FOR” the election of each of the nominees to the Board named herein, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm and “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal relating to the adoption of a policy on board diversity. It is not expected that any additional matters will be brought before the Annual Meeting, but if other matters are properly presented, the persons named as proxies in the proxy card or their substitutes will vote in their discretion on such matters.

The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your shares are held. If you own shares of record, meaning that your shares are represented by certificates or book entries in your name so that you appear as a stockholder on the records of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (“AST”), our stock transfer agent, you may vote by proxy, meaning you authorize individuals named in the proxy card to vote your shares. You may provide this authorization by voting via the Internet, by telephone or (if you have received paper copies of our proxy materials) by returning a proxy card. In these circumstances, if you do not vote by proxy or virtually at the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted. If you own shares in street name, meaning that your shares are held by a bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee, you may instruct that institution on how to vote your shares. You may provide these instructions by voting via the Internet, by telephone, or (if you have received paper copies of proxy materials through your bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee) by returning a voting instruction form received from that institution. In these circumstances, if you do not provide voting instructions, the institution may nevertheless vote your shares on your behalf with respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, but cannot vote your shares on any other matters being considered at the Annual Meeting.

Voting Standard

With respect to the election of directors (Item 1), a nominee for director shall be elected to the Board by a plurality of the votes cast in respect of the shares of common stock present virtually or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. A plurality vote requirement means that the director nominees with the greatest number of votes cast, even if less than a majority, will be elected. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” with respect to each nominee. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote with respect to the nominee from which they are withheld. Withhold votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election. Broker non-votes occur when a person holding shares in street name, such as through a brokerage firm, does not provide instructions as to how to vote those shares and the broker lacks the authority to vote uninstructed shares at its discretion. Under current Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) interpretations that govern broker non-votes, Item 1 and Item 3 are considered non-discretionary matters, and a broker will lack the authority to vote uninstructed shares at its discretion on such proposals. Item 2 is considered a discretionary matter, and a broker will be permitted to exercise its discretion to vote uninstructed shares on the proposal.

With respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 (Item 2), the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of common stock present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve the matter. With respect to Item 2 you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN”. For this matter, abstentions are not counted as affirmative votes on a matter but are counted as present at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote and will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the matter.

With respect to the stockholder proposal relating to the adoption of a policy on board diversity (Item 3), the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of common stock present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve the matter. With respect to Item 3 you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN”. For this matter, abstentions are not counted as affirmative votes on a matter but are counted as present at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote and will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the matter, and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of this matter.

Voting via the Internet or by telephone helps save money by reducing postage and proxy tabulation costs.

We encourage you to register to receive all future stockholder communications electronically, instead of in print. This means that, after you register, access to the 2021 Annual Report, Proxy Statement, and other correspondence will be delivered to you via e-mail.

Voting and Attendance at the Annual Meeting

If you own common stock of record, you may virtually attend the Annual Meeting and vote virtually, regardless of whether you have previously voted by proxy card, via the Internet, or by telephone. If you own common stock in street name, you may virtually attend the Annual Meeting, but in order to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting you must obtain a “legal proxy” from the bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee that holds your shares. You should contact your bank or brokerage account representative to learn how to obtain a legal proxy. We encourage you to vote your shares in advance of the Annual Meeting by one of the methods described above, even if you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting. If you have already voted prior to the Annual Meeting, you may nevertheless change or revoke your vote at the Annual Meeting as described below. Only stockholders as of the record date (March 14, 2022) are entitled to virtually attend the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxyholder or representative to virtually attend on the stockholder’s behalf.

Revocation

If you own common stock of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your voting instructions at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy (via the Internet or telephone or by returning a proxy card) bearing a later date or by virtually attending the Annual Meeting and voting. A stockholder owning common stock in street name may revoke or change voting instructions by contacting the bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee holding the shares or by obtaining a legal proxy from such institution and voting virtually at the Annual Meeting.

References to Websites

Information contained on our website, or any website that is linked to or otherwise referenced herein, is not incorporated into, or a part of, this Proxy Statement.

Our Board currently has eleven seats, divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors. One Class III seat is currently vacant and will be vacant at the time of the Annual Meeting and until the Board either reduces its size or elects a candidate to fill such vacancy.

The Board proposes that Steven Berns, Billy Hult and Lee Olesky be reelected to Class III for new terms of three years each. Each nominee for director will, if elected, continue in office until the 2025 Annual Meeting and until the director’s successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until the earlier of the director’s death, resignation or removal. The proxy holders named on the proxy card intend to vote the proxy (if you are a stockholder of record) for the election of each of these nominees, unless you indicate on the proxy card that your vote should be cast against any of the nominees. Under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. Accordingly, proxies cannot be voted for greater than the three Class III seats open for election.

Each nominee has consented to be named as a nominee in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. If any nominee is not able to serve, proxies will be voted in favor of the other nominees and may be voted for a substitute nominee, unless the Board chooses to reduce the number of directors serving on the Board.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” each nominee.

Biographical and Related Information of Director Nominees and Continuing Directors

The principal occupations and certain other information about our director nominees and our continuing directors (including the skills and qualifications that led to the conclusion that they should serve as directors) are set forth below. The age shown below for each director is as of May 10, 2022, which is the date of the Annual Meeting.

Nominees for Director Whose Terms Would Expire at the 2025 Annual Meeting

The Board has nominated three directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve for three-year terms ending with the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the earlier of the director’s death, resignation, or removal. Each nominee is currently a director of the Company and has agreed to serve if elected.

 

Steven Berns

 

		Age: 57		Director Since:       April 2020
		Tradeweb Committees: Audit Committee (Chair)

Key Experience and Qualifications:

 

•

Extensive financial knowledge

•

Chief Financial Officer of TripleLift, Shutterstock, Tribune, Revlon, TWM LLC and MDC Partners

Mr. Berns is currently the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of TripleLift, and previously served as Chief Financial Officer of GTT Communications, Inc. from April 2020 until January 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Berns served as Chief Financial Officer of Shutterstock, Inc. (“Shutterstock”) from September 2015 to June 2019, and as Chief Operating Officer and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Shutterstock from March 2017 to March 2019 and March 2019 to June 2019, respectively. Prior to joining Shutterstock, Mr. Berns served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tribune Media Company (“Tribune”) from 2013 to 2015, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Revlon, Inc. (“Revlon”) from 2009 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Berns served as the Chief Financial Officer of Tradeweb Markets LLC (“TWM LLC”), the Company’s predecessor, and President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of MDC Partners, Inc. (“MDC Partners”). He previously held several senior financial positions at the Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and Revlon. Mr. Berns currently serves as a board member and Chair of the Audit Committee for Forum Merger IV Corporation and has previously served as a board member of Forum Merger Corporation, LivePerson, Inc. and Shutterstock. Mr. Berns received a B.S. in Business and Economics from Lehigh University and an Executive MBA in Finance from New York University, Stern School of Business.

 

Billy Hult

 

		Age: 52		Director Since:       March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: None

Key Experience and Qualifications:

 

•

Management, industry experience

•

Operational expertise in our business that he has developed as our President

Mr. Hult has served as Tradeweb’s Chief Executive Officer-elect since February 2022, and as its President since its formation. Mr. Hult has served as TWM LLC’s President since September 2008 and, prior to the series of reorganization transactions that were completed on April 4, 2019 in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, which closed on April 8, 2019 (the “IPO”), whereby TWM LLC became the principal operating subsidiary of the Company (the “Reorganization Transactions”), served on the former board of managers of TWM LLC beginning in September 2008. Mr. Hult joined Tradeweb in July 2000 as a product manager and oversaw the creation of our TBA-MBS marketplace. In 2005, Mr. Hult went on to serve as the head of U.S. products overseeing the firm’s expansion into new asset classes. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Mr. Hult held a variety of trading positions at Société Générale from 1997 to 2000. He received a B.A. from Denison University.

Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 2023 Annual Meeting

 

John Finley

 

		Age: 65		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair)

Key Experience and Qualifications:

 

•

Extensive business, management and legal experience

Mr. Finley is a Senior Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer of Blackstone and serves on its Management Committee. Before joining Blackstone, Mr. Finley had been a partner with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett for 22 years where he was a member of that law firm’s Executive Committee and Co-Head of Global M&A. Mr. Finley is an Adviser on the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Corporate Governance Project and a member of the Dean’s Advisory Board of Harvard Law School, the Advisory Board of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, the Board of Advisors of the Penn Institute for Law and Economics and the Advisory Board of the Penn Netter Center for Community Partnerships. Mr. Finley is also currently a member of the U.S. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. He has served on the Board of Advisors of the Knight-Bagehot Fellowship in Economics and Business Journalism at Columbia University, the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights and the Jewish Board of Family and Children Services. He has also served as Chairman of the Annual International Mergers & Acquisitions Conference of the International Bar Association and on the Committee of Securities Regulation of the New York State Bar Association. Mr. Finley has a BS in Economics, summa cum laude, from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (1978), a B.A. in History, summa cum laude, from the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Pennsylvania (1978) and a JD, cum laude, from Harvard Law School (1981).

 

Scott Ganeles

 

		Age: 58		Director Since:     March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee

Key Experience and Qualifications:

 

•

Extensive business and management experience and thorough knowledge of our industry

Mr. Ganeles is currently a Senior Partner at WestCap Group, LLC, a growth equity firm that invests in growth-stage technology businesses in the financial technology, real estate technology and healthcare technology industries as well as asset-light marketplace platforms. Prior to that, Mr. Ganeles was the Chief Executive Officer of i-Deal from December 2000 until it merged with Hemscott in 2006 to form Ipreo Holdings LLC. Mr. Ganeles became Chief Executive Officer of Ipreo after the merger and continued as Chief Executive Officer until August 2018. Prior to Ipreo Holdings LLC, Mr. Ganeles was President and Co-Founder of the Carson Group from June 1990 to September 2000. Mr. Ganeles received a B.A. in Political Science from Brown University.

Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 2024 Annual Meeting

 

Balbir Bakhshi

 

		Age: 52		Director Since:       July 2021
		Tradeweb Committees: None

Key Experience and Qualifications:

 

•

Extensive background in leadership, operations and risk management

Mr. Bakhshi has served as the Chief Risk Officer of the London Stock Exchange Group plc (“LSEG”) and member of LSEG’s executive committee since January 2021. Prior to joining LSEG, Mr. Bakhshi was Group Head of Non-Financial Risk Management at Deutsche Bank. Prior to this, Mr. Bakhshi was Global Head of Operational Risk Management at Credit Suisse and previously held a variety of senior roles at Credit Suisse including UK Investment Banking Chief Risk Officer and Head of Market Risk. Mr. Bakhshi received a B.A. from the University of Westminster and an MSc from Brunel University.

 

Paula Madoff

 

		Age:     54		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees:     Audit Committee, Compensation     Committee, Nominating and     Corporate Governance Committee

Key Experience and Qualifications:

 

•

Deep bench of knowledge and experience working with sales and distributions for Goldman’s interest rate products and mortgages

•

Significant service on boards and board committees

Ms. Madoff has served as Tradeweb’s Lead Independent Director since February 2022. Ms. Madoff currently serves as an Advisor to Goldman Sachs (“Goldman”). She had been employed by Goldman for 28 years where she was most recently a Partner and Head of Sales and Distribution for Interest Rate Products and Mortgages until her retirement from this position in August 2017. From August 2017 to April 2018, Ms. Madoff was employed as an Advisory Director at Goldman. She brings experience in managing regulatory and market structure changes, investing, risk management, and capital markets activities. Ms. Madoff serves as a non-executive director on the boards of KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.; Great-West Lifeco; and ICE Benchmark Administration, where she is also Chair of the ICE LIBOR Oversight Committee. She held several additional leadership positions at Goldman, including Co-Chair of the Retirement Committee, overseeing 401(k) and pension plan assets; Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives Products, L.P.; and was a member of its Securities Division Operating Committee and Firmwide New Activity Committee. Before joining Goldman, Ms. Madoff worked in Mergers and Acquisitions at Wasserstein Perella & Co. and in Corporate Finance at Bankers Trust. Ms. Madoff is a 2018 David Rockefeller Fellow, a member of the Harvard Business School Alumni Board, a member of the Harvard Kennedy School Women’s Leadership Board, and a Director of Hudson River Park Friends. Ms. Madoff received a B.A. degree in Economics, cum laude, from Lafayette College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Controlled Company Exception and Director Independence

Our Board has affirmatively determined that Mr. Berns, Mr. Ganeles, Mr. Hughes and Ms. Madoff are independent directors under the rules of Nasdaq, and are independent directors as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.

The Refinitiv Direct Owner and an indirect subsidiary of Refinitiv that, prior to the Reorganization Transactions, owned membership interests of TWM LLC and that continues to own common membership interests of TWM LLC (“LLC Interests”) after the completion of the IPO and Reorganization Transactions (the “Refinitiv LLC Owner”, and together with the Refinitiv Direct Owner, the “Refinitiv Owners”), who are parties to that certain stockholders agreement with the Company (the “Stockholders Agreement”), hold Class B common stock and Class D common stock collectively representing a majority of the combined voting power of our total outstanding common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of Nasdaq. Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

We rely on all of the exemptions listed above. As a result, we do not have a majority of independent directors and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee do not consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the applicable stock exchange rules.

Board Leadership

The Board directs and oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Company in a manner consistent with the best interests of the Company. The Board’s responsibility is one of oversight, and in performing its oversight role, the Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared with our stockholders.

The Board selects its chairperson (“Chairperson”) and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in the manner it considers in the best interests of the Company. Therefore, the Board does not have a policy on whether the roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or combined and, if it is to be separate, whether the Chairperson should be selected from the independent directors. At the present time, Mr. Olesky serves as the Chairperson of the Board.

The Board believes that the current leadership structure is appropriate given Mr. Olesky’s role in co-founding the Company. In addition, the Board believes that the leadership structure improves the Board’s ability to focus on key policy and operational issues and helps the Company operate in the interest of the stockholders.

Executive Sessions

The non-management directors meet in executive session with no members of management present at every regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, and, if the non-management directors include directors who have not been determined to be independent, the independent directors shall separately meet in a private session at least once a year that excludes management and directors who have not been determined to be independent. The Chairperson of the Board (or, if the Chairperson is a management director or is not an independent director, a director designated by the non-management or independent directors, as applicable) presides at the executive sessions of the Board.

Communications with Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing to the General Counsel, Tradeweb Markets Inc., 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. Written communications may be addressed to the Chairperson of the Board, the chairperson of any of the Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees, or to the non-management or independent directors as a group. The General Counsel will forward such communications to the appropriate party.

Board Diversity Policy

The Company recognizes and embraces the benefits of having a diverse Board to enhance the quality of its performance. With a view to achieving a sustainable and balanced development, the Company sees diversity at the Board level as an essential element in supporting the attainment of its strategic objectives and its sustainable development. In designing the Board’s composition, Board diversity is considered from a number of aspects, including but not limited to gender, age, race, ethnicity, nationality, cultural and educational background, professional experience, skills, knowledge and length of service. The ultimate decision on all Board nominations will be based on merit and contribution that the selected candidates will bring to the Board, having due regard for the benefits of diversity on the Board.

Risk Oversight

The Board exercises direct oversight of strategic risks to the Company. The Audit Committee reviews guidelines and policies governing the process by which senior management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk, including the Company’s major financial and operational risk exposures and the steps management takes to monitor and control such exposures. The Company’s Chief Risk Officer updates the Board and the Audit Committee regularly throughout the year, and more frequently as necessary and appropriate. The Board and Audit Committee provide feedback and recommendations accordingly. With respect to cybersecurity risk oversight, our Board and our Audit Committee receive updates from our Chief Information Officer and Chief Risk Officer or their delegates to assess the primary cybersecurity risks facing the Company and the measures the Company is taking to mitigate such risks. In addition to such updates, our Board and our Audit Committee receive updates from management as to changes to the Company’s cybersecurity risk profile or significant newly identified risks.

The Compensation Committee oversees risks relating to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board by overseeing and evaluating programs and risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure and corporate governance. Each committee charged with risk oversight reports to the Board on those matters.

Corporate Governance Documents

Please visit our investor relations website at https://investors.tradeweb.com/corporate-governance, “Documents and Charters,” for additional information on our corporate governance, including:

Board Meetings and Committees

The Board meets regularly during the year, and holds special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent whenever circumstances require. During 2021, there were six meetings of the Board. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and the total number of meetings held by all committees on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served) during 2021. In addition, directors are expected to make every effort to virtually attend any meetings of stockholders.

The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (collectively, the “Committees”), each of which hold meetings and act by unanimous written consent whenever circumstances require. The Committees keep the Board informed of their actions and provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to stockholders. The table below provides current membership information as well as meeting information for the last fiscal year.

The functions performed by these Committees, which are set forth in more detail in their charters, are summarized below.

Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Berns, as Chairperson, Mr. Ganeles, Mr. Hughes and Ms. Madoff. The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Mr. Berns qualifies as our “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of regulations adopted by the SEC and each Audit Committee member meets Nasdaq’s financial sophistication requirements. Our Board has also determined that each of Mr. Berns, Mr. Ganeles, Mr. Hughes and Ms. Madoff are “independent” as defined under Nasdaq rules and the Exchange Act and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The Audit Committee recommends the annual appointment and reviews the independence of auditors and reviews the scope of audit and non-audit assignments and related fees, the results of the annual audit, accounting principles used in financial reporting, internal auditing procedures, the adequacy of our internal control procedures, related party transactions and investigations into matters related to audit functions. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing risk management on behalf of our Board.

Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Finley, Mr. Ganeles and Ms. Madoff. The principal responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to review and approve matters involving executive and director compensation, recommend changes in employee benefit programs, authorize equity and other incentive arrangements and authorize our Company to enter into employment and other employee-related agreements. The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Finley, as Chairperson and Ms. Madoff. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, makes recommendations for nominees for committees and develops, recommends to the Board and reviews our corporate governance principles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Director Nominations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies individuals believed to be qualified as candidates to serve on the Board and selects, or recommends that the Board select, the nominees for all directorships to be filled by the Board or by our stockholders at an annual or special meeting. In identifying candidates for membership on the Board, the Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include (a) individual qualifications, including strength of character, mature judgment, familiarity with the Company’s business and industry, independence of thought and an ability to work collegially and (b) all other factors the Committee considers appropriate, which may include age, gender and ethnic diversity, diversity of background, existing commitments to other businesses, potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits, legal considerations such as antitrust issues, corporate governance background, various and relevant career experience, relevant technical skills, relevant business or government acumen, financial and accounting background, executive compensation background and the size, composition and combined expertise of the existing Board. The Committee also may consider the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board. When evaluating whether to re-nominate existing directors, the Committee considers matters relating to the retirement of current directors, including term limits or age limits, as well as the performance of such directors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director candidates recommended by stockholders on a substantially similar basis as it considers other nominees. Any recommendation submitted to the Secretary should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and the written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Secretary, Tradeweb Markets Inc., 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. All recommendations for nomination received by the Secretary that satisfy the requirements of our Bylaws relating to such director nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Please see the section titled “Proposals of Stockholders” for information regarding the advance notice provisions applicable to stockholder director nominations set forth in our Bylaws.

In addition, pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, the Refinitiv Owners have the right to designate nominees to our Board subject to the maintenance of certain ownership requirements in us. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Related Party Transactions Entered Into in Connection With the IPO — Stockholders Agreement” for additional information.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our executive officers serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. No interlocking relationship exists between any member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) and any executive, member of the Board or member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any other company.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and all global employees. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at https://investors.tradeweb.com/corporate-governance/. See “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Documents” for additional information. In the event that we amend or waive certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer that requires disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we intend to disclose the same on our website. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was most recently amended on March 25, 2022. The information contained on, or accessible from, our website is not part of this Proxy Statement by reference or otherwise.

Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

We have long been committed to creating and fostering an inclusive workplace, celebrating our diverse employee base, providing transparency and innovation for our markets and ensuring transparency and validity for the data that propels them. Our long-term view encompasses ever more sustainable ways of working and investing as we forge the links between better serving markets and better serving the world.

Beginning in 2019, we have given much thought into formulating what environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) means to our Company and how to best navigate our ESG journey as it relates to our various stakeholders. Our Board is enthusiastic about advancing our ESG strategies across the Company, with a planned increase in scope and focus on providing oversight and guidance for our ESG commitments and direction. The Company’s ESG strategy and initiatives are overseen by the Board’s

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which periodically reviews and makes recommendations to the Company in order to further our ESG goals. In 2020, we formed an ESG Steering Committee comprised of senior level executives across the Company. The ESG Steering Committee is an advisory board assembled to guide our focus and ensure delivery of a thoughtful approach to integrating our ESG strategy into all aspects of our business and operations. To support this implementation, in December 2020 we created and filled a dedicated role to organize and manage our global Corporate Social Responsibility and ESG Initiatives. This role reports directly to the Global Head of Corporate Development, who is a member of the Executive Committee and the chair of the ESG Steering Committee.

In September 2021, we published our inaugural 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report to increase transparency for our strong foundation in ESG matters. In preparing our 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report, we evaluated multiple disclosure frameworks and ultimately decided to use a blend of metrics (including the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) metrics), as well as Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) guidance, that we feel are most relevant to our position at the intersection of financial and technology services. The report outlines our commitment to corporate transparency and comprehensive ESG standards, discussing in detail our progress toward quantifying and reducing our carbon footprint, growing our use of renewable energy, demonstrating our commitment to advancing sustainable finance and creating solutions to help our clients pursue investment in climate-aligned strategies.

In 2021, we also joined the Climate Bonds Initiative’s (“CBI”) Partnership Programme to promote the visibility and accessibility of green bond trading activity across a wide range of asset classes, as well as to provide more clarity around our own green bond trading volumes. In 2021, CBI-screened green bonds accounted for $136 billion of the total $148 billion in green bond trading volume executed on Tradeweb, a record and an increase of 72% from 2020.

Equally important is the progress we’re making on diversity, equity and inclusion, through our many employee resource groups. Tradeweb is committed to creating and fostering an inclusive workplace, growing our diverse employee base with many opportunities for career development.

For further detail regarding our ESG initiatives, our 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report is available on our website at https://investors.tradeweb.com. See “Tradeweb Corporate Responsibility” for additional information. The references to our 2020 Corporate Responsibility Report and our website are not intended to incorporate the information in that report or on our website into this Proxy Statement by reference.

Under the rules and regulations of the SEC, Nasdaq and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee considers the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm and participates in the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm’s lead engagement partner. The Audit Committee has appointed, and, as a matter of good corporate governance, is requesting ratification by our stockholders of the appointment of, the registered public accounting firm of Deloitte to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Deloitte has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since November 2018.

The Board and the Audit Committee believe that the continued retention of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte, the Audit Committee will evaluate the stockholder vote when considering the selection of a registered public accounting firm for the audit engagement for the 2022 fiscal year. In addition, even if stockholders ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee may nevertheless periodically request proposals from the major registered public accounting firms and as a result of such process may select Deloitte or another registered public accounting firm as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to virtually attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Consistent with SEC and PCAOB requirements regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of, the independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Prior to engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next year’s audit, management will submit to the Audit Committee for approval a list of services and related fees expected to be rendered during that year within each of the following four categories of services:

Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves independent registered public accounting firm services within each category and the fees of each category are budgeted. The Audit Committee requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval categories. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All of the services in the table below were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The following is a description of the professional services performed and the fees billed by Deloitte for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

The Vermont Pension Investment Committee, a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s common stock, requested that the Company include the below stockholder proposal in the proxy materials regarding the Annual Meeting.

Stockholder Proposal

“Resolved, shareholders request that the Board of Directors of Tradeweb Markets adopt a policy for improving board diversity (the “Policy”) requiring that the initial list of candidates from which new management supported director nominees are chosen (the “Initial List”) by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should include, but need not be limited to, qualified women and minority candidates. The Policy should provide that any third-party consultant asked to furnish an Initial List will be requested to include such candidates.”

Supporting Statement

“Currently, Tradeweb Markets has a single woman on its Board of Directors and the racial composition is unclear. A McKinsey study found that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity in corporate leadership had 21% likelihood of outperforming bottom-quartile industry peers on profitability. Similarly, leaders in racial and ethnic diversity are 33% more likely to outperform peers on profitability. (https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity)

Adopting a policy that requires the consideration of women and minority candidates for every open director seat enhances the nomination process, and assists the Committee in developing a diverse Board. A 2016 study published by Harvard Business Review found that including more than one woman or minority in a finalist pool changes the status quo to help combat unconscious bias among interviewers. Researchers found that the odds of hiring a woman were 79 times greater when there were at least two women in the finalist pool, and the odds of hiring a minority were 193 times greater when there were at least two minority candidates in the finalist pool. (https://hbr.org/2016/04/if-theres-only-one-woman-in-your-candidate-pool-theres-statistically-no-chance-shell-be-hired)

Many companies inadvertently narrow the candidate pool in new director searches by only considering CEOs and C-Suite nominees. Diverse search policies have been adopted by the Nominating and Governance Committees of Amazon, Facebook, Intel, Costco, Home Depot, Oracle, McDonald’s, Marten Transport, Marathon Petroleum, and United Continental. Additionally, key leaders in the business community support this policy direction. In its 2016 Principles of Corporate Governance, the Business Roundtable calls on boards to “develop a framework for identifying appropriately diverse candidates that allows the nominating/governance committee to consider women, minorities, and others with diverse backgrounds as candidates for each open board seat.” (http://businessroundtable.org/corporate-governance)

Stock exchange operator Nasdaq requires listed company to have diverse boards or explain why they lack diversity. Nasdaq defines diversity as two diverse directors, including one who identifies as female and another as an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+ or explain why they lack that composition. Under the new listing standards, companies also are required to disclose the diversity of their boards. Disclosure is required by the later of August 8, 2022 or the date the company files its next proxy statement.

Additionally, California and Illinois are among the growing number of states that have laws on board diversity for firms headquartered in their states.

We urge shareholders to vote in favor of this proposal.”

The Board of Directors recommends a vote against this proposal for the following reasons:

After careful consideration, the Board opposes this proposal because the Company already has in place a Board Diversity Policy, which the Board believes achieves the aims intended by the stockholder proposal.

The Board acknowledges the benefits of diversity throughout the Company, a tenet illustrated by the actions and existing policies of the Company. The Company has a deeply ingrained commitment to diversity,

one that is clearly exemplified by the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The Board Diversity Policy located within the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines requires that “Board diversity [be] considered from a number of aspects, including but not limited to gender, age, race, ethnicity, nationality, cultural and educational background[.]”

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter specifically refers to the Board Diversity Policy as a factor to consider when identifying candidates for membership on the Board, when making recommendation for existing members’ reelections and when making recommendations regarding the size and composition of the Board.

The Company has and continues to be in compliance with Nasdaq requirements regarding board diversity, and has included in this Proxy Statement a Board Diversity Matrix in compliance with the updated listing standards.

The Company is also long committed to providing a diverse and inclusive workplace, with a focus on growing the diversity within its employee base. As a priority, the Company strives to ensure the most diverse set of talent to be considered for its open positions. In order to promote and source diverse talent, the Company partners with a number of organizations in its hiring processes and continues to expand the partners it works with to ensure it has appropriate channels through which to source talent. To that end, the Company currently works with approximately 18 organizations globally with a specific focus on sourcing eligible candidates from diverse backgrounds and with diverse skillsets for open positions. For example, the Company uses Direct Employers to post roles to over 300 diverse job boards globally, to ensure its direct sourcing of candidates is representative of its diversity goals.

For these reason, the Board recommends stockholders to vote against this proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “against” the stockholder proposal relating to the adoption of an additional policy on board diversity.

The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, for preparing the financial statements, and for the reporting process. The Audit Committee members do not serve as professional accountants or auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and our independent registered public accounting firm. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to audit and report on the conformity of the Company’s financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

In this context, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Audited Financial Statements”), management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and SEC, including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding our independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

Based upon the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Audited Financial Statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee

Steven Berns, Chairperson

Scott Ganeles

Von Hughes

Paula Madoff

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock as of March 14, 2022 for:

The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under rules issued by the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power. Applicable percentage ownership is based on 107,246,495 shares of Class A common stock, 96,933,192 shares of Class B common stock, 1,654,825 shares of Class C common stock and 28,325,833 shares of Class D common stock outstanding as of March 14, 2022. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by an individual or entity and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options, or other rights, including the redemption rights described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, held by such person that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 14, 2022 are considered outstanding, although these shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all listed stockholders is c/o Tradeweb Markets Inc., 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. Each of the stockholders listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder unless noted otherwise, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers, including age as of May 10, 2022, other than for Mr. Olesky and Mr. Hult, whose biographical information is presented under “Item 1 — Election of Directors.”

Enrico Bruni, 50, has served as Managing Director, Head of Europe and Asia Business of TWM LLC since February 2013 and has served in the same position at Tradeweb since April 2019. Mr. Bruni joined Tradeweb in 2002 and has been instrumental in developing the interest rate swaps business in Europe and Asia. Prior to joining Tradeweb, from 1995 to 2002, Mr. Bruni was at J.P. Morgan where he worked in a number of business and product management roles across the markets division, with particular focus on their e-trading strategy. Mr. Bruni received a business management degree from L. Bocconi University, Milan.

Douglas Friedman, 51, has served as Tradeweb’s General Counsel and Secretary since its formation and as the General Counsel of TWM LLC since November 2009, prior to which he served as the Assistant General Counsel of TWM LLC beginning in June 2005. Mr. Friedman is actively involved in regulatory discussions impacting global financial markets and is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Treasury Market Practices Group and has participated in Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and industry discussions on the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as well as SEC panels on securities and derivatives reform. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Mr. Friedman worked in the litigation department of King & Spalding LLP, an international law firm, from 2001 to 2005, where he focused on securities litigation and regulatory investigations. Prior to that, he worked at Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft LLP and at Gibbons P.C. He received a B.A. from the University of Michigan and a J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law.

Sara Furber, 47, has served as Tradeweb’s Chief Financial Officer since joining the Company in September 2021. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Ms. Furber served as Chief Financial Officer of U.S. equity exchange operator IEX Group from 2018 to 2021. As Chief Financial Officer of IEX Group, Ms. Furber led the company’s finance function and oversaw its new business portfolio, including technology businesses such as data platform IEX Cloud. Prior to joining IEX in 2016, she was a Managing Director and a member of Morgan Stanley’s Management Committee. She held several senior executive positions at Morgan Stanley, including Chief Operating Officer for Wealth Management. Ms. Furber previously served as Chief Operating Officer for Global Corporate and Investment Banking at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, after leading Investor Relations for Merrill Lynch during the global financial crisis and through its merger with Bank of America. Ms. Furber began her career in investment banking in 1997. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University.

Simon Maisey, 50, has served as Managing Director, Global Head of Corporate Development of TWM LLC since May 2016 and has served in the same position at Tradeweb since April 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Maisey served as Managing Director in Finance and Business Development of TWM LLC beginning in May 2014. Prior to joining Tradeweb, from 1998 to May 2014, Mr. Maisey worked at J.P. Morgan, most recently in the position of Managing Director, eCommerce for the global rates business. In addition, he has also held roles as COO and CFO of J.P. Morgan’s fixed income businesses and served on the TWM LLC board of directors as a J.P. Morgan representative from 2009 to 2014. He holds a MEng (Hons) from the University of Oxford.

Justin Peterson, 59, has served as Chief Technology Officer of Tradeweb since April 1, 2020, and has served on TWM LLC’s Global Operating Committee since January 2014. Mr. Peterson joined TWM LLC in 1999 and served as Managing Director, Head of Institutional Technology, from January 2008 to March 2020. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Mr. Peterson served as Vice President at Citibank from 1995 to 1999. Prior to that, he held positions at NYNEX Science and Technology and Hughes Aircraft Company. Mr. Peterson holds a B.S. in engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and a Ph.D. and M.S. in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Scott Zucker, 53, has served as Tradeweb’s Chief Risk and Administrative Officer since February 2020 and served as Chief Administrative Officer since its formation and as the Chief Administrative Officer of TWM LLC since November 2009. He joined TWM LLC in 2002 as General Counsel. Prior to joining Tradeweb, from 1999 to 2002, Mr. Zucker worked in the Corporate Department of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, an international law firm, providing legal, regulatory and securities law support exclusively to Bloomberg LP. He also worked in the Corporate Department of Robinson, Silverman, Pearce, Aronsohn and Berman LLP (now Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP) from 1996 to 1999, where he specialized in general corporate and securities matters. Mr. Zucker serves on the board of directors of Habitat for Humanity NYC and is a member of the audit committee. He received a B.A. from Tufts University and a J.D. from Hofstra University School of Law.

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Purpose

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) presents in detail our executive compensation philosophy and practices, describing each element of compensation and the decision-making process by our Compensation Committee that supports it. We encourage you to read this CD&A in conjunction with the compensation tables that follow for additional context to the Compensation Committee’s decisions with respect to the 2021 compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), as listed below.

Company Overview

Summary of 2021 Performance     

Tradeweb is a leader in building and operating electronic marketplaces for its network of clients located in 65+ countries globally. We have a powerful client network that had a daily trading average in 2021 of over $1 trillion across our global electronic marketplaces, which are deeply integrated in, and supported by, our proprietary technology. Since our inception, we have combined the creativity of our employees, power of our technology, and depth of our network to collaboratively innovate with our clients to simplify their workflows across the fixed income and equity markets.

Beginning in 2020 and continuing through 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic created a global emergency, requiring businesses to reassess their operations and take steps to ensure the safety of their employees and survival of their business. Despite the widespread economic uncertainty caused by COVID-19, Tradeweb, as a virtual marketplace company, was able to quickly and efficiently invoke its business continuity procedures to enable employees to work from home and customers to connect from their business continuity infrastructure to our marketplaces. As such, we have successfully avoided any layoffs, furloughs or salary reductions among our workforce due to COVID-19, while being able to maintain our business operations and keep our employees safe. Beginning in June 2021, Tradeweb transitioned to a hybrid approach for many roles in our return to office plans. Our creative and flexible return to office plans aim to keep driving our business forward and allow safe collaboration and positive team dynamics.

Our markets are large and growing. Electronic trading continues to increase across the markets in which we operate as a result of market demand for greater transparency, higher execution quality, operational efficiency and lower costs, as well as regulatory changes. We believe our deep client relationships, asset class breadth, geographic reach, regulatory knowledge and scalable technology position us to continue to be at the forefront of the evolution of electronic trading. Our platforms provide transparent, efficient, cost-effective and compliant trading solutions across multiple products, regions and regulatory regimes. As market participants seek to trade across multiple asset classes, reduce their costs of trading and increase the effectiveness of their trading, including through the use of data and analytics, we believe the demand for our platforms and electronic trading solutions will continue to grow.

We are focused on balancing revenue growth and margin expansion to create long-term value and we have a track record of growth and financial performance. By expanding the scope of our platforms and solutions, building scale and integration across marketplaces and benefiting from broader network effects, we have been able to grow both our transaction volume and subscription-based revenues. Our 2021 results demonstrate that our investments in our network, technology, and people continue to bring value to the Company’s stockholders and achieve our goal of long-term value creation. Highlights of our 2021 financial performance and other matters include:

Compensation Program Highlights for 2021

The following are some of the highlights of our fiscal 2021 executive compensation program:

“Say-on-Pay” Vote

Prior to 2020, Tradeweb was considered an “emerging growth company” and therefore not required to undertake a say-on-pay vote for executive compensation. Last year was the first year Tradeweb conducted a say-on-pay and a say-on-frequency vote. Our say-on-pay proposal for 2021 was approved by approximately 98.89% of the eligible votes, indicating strong support for our executive compensation program. In furtherance of the Company’s interest in stockholder engagement and our pay-for-performance philosophy, the Company, including our Compensation Committee, has continued to examine our executive compensation program to ensure alignment between the interests of our executives and our stockholders. No significant changes were made to our executive compensation program in 2021 as a direct result of the 2021 say-on-pay vote.

Our stockholders also approved our say-on-frequency vote proposal in 2021. As such, our advisory say-on-pay vote will be held every three years.

Determining Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation Practices

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain the leadership needed for the success of our business. We believe that investing in our talent through a market-based and flexible total compensation program has been critical to the success of Tradeweb, enabling us to promote both short- and long-term profitable growth of the Company and achieve our ultimate goal of bringing value to our customers and stockholders. Our compensation philosophy emphasizes creating an “ownership mentality” to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. To this end, our total compensation program is guided by the following principles:

Compensation Determination Process

Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee of our Board is responsible for establishing and overseeing the executive compensation arrangements for our executive officers, including our NEOs, as described above in the section titled “Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee.” The formal written Compensation Committee charter is available on our website.

The Compensation Committee meets annually, along with, at the request of the Compensation Committee, the Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel. As part of the annual review process, the Compensation Committee will specifically:

The Compensation Committee has delegated certain responsibilities to its Chief Executive Officer, and generally relies on recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer for decisions concerning compensation for NEOs other than the Chief Executive Officer and President, as described further below.

Role of our CEO. Our Chief Executive Officer informs our Compensation Committee on the individual performance and contributions of each of the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer and President), and annually reviews, with the Compensation Committee, base salary, non-equity incentive plan compensation and equity awards for the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer and President). The Compensation Committee reviews and takes into account such recommendations. While the Compensation Committee has approval over the final compensation decisions for the NEOs, it generally provides the Chief

Executive Officer with discretion to make reasonable adjustments that he deems prudent (other than with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and President).

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program consists of a mix of fixed and variable pay elements, with the latter tied to both short- and long-term company success. Performance-based pay elements are linked to goals that we believe will deliver both year-over-year and long-term increases in stockholder value. The elements of total direct executive compensation for our NEOs include:

The Compensation Committee does not maintain any formal policy or formula for allocating the mix of compensation as it believes it is more important to remain flexible to respond to business needs and shifts in

the marketplace in which the Company must compete to recruit and retain executive talent, and also to take into consideration individual performance and responsibilities of the NEOs each year. Therefore, the Compensation Committee retains the authority to review our NEOs’ compensation periodically and to use its discretion to adjust the mix of compensation and the amount of any element of compensation as it deems appropriate for each NEO.

The charts below illustrate the allocation of the principal compensation components discussed above for our NEOs for fiscal 2021.

The amounts included in the above charts are based on (1) grant-date fair values for long-term incentive equity awards, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table below, (2) target bonus compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and President, and (3) actual bonuses earned in 2021 for all other NEOs. For purposes of this graphic, we have excluded Mr. Warshaw and Ms. Furber given their compensation for 2021 was not representative of an executive’s typical annual compensation given Mr. Warshaw’s departure and Ms. Furber’s commencement of employment.

Fiscal 2021 Compensation Program in Detail

Base Salaries

We believe that base salary plays an important role in attracting and retaining top executive talent. We set base salaries that reflect each individual’s duties, responsibilities, experience and performance. Base salaries are reviewed annually by (A) the Compensation Committee for the Chief Executive Officer and President and (B) the Chief Executive Officer for all other NEOs; however we generally do not provide for merit salary increases for the NEOs other than in connection with an executive’s promotion. As such, the Compensation Committee determined to keep base salaries for the NEOs in fiscal 2021 consistent with the base salaries provided for fiscal 2020, as set forth on the table below, other than Mr. Peterson whose salary was increased from $300,000 to $400,000 in connection with his promotion to Chief Technology Officer in 2020.

Annual Cash Bonuses

CEO and President

Messrs. Olesky and Hult are each party to an employment agreement with TWM LLC (described further below in the section titled “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Employment Agreements with our Named Executive Officers”) pursuant to which the executive is entitled to an annual cash bonus based on Company performance. For calendar year 2021, Messrs. Olesky and Hult had a target bonus opportunity of $4.25 million and $3.75 million, respectively. Achievement of the annual bonus is based on TWM LLC’s attainment of certain performance goals set annually by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee sets the target performance goals each year based on the budget approved by the Board the preceding quarter, reflecting a rigorous goal for the Company set to motivate the executives and drive performance. The maximum performance goals were set at a level that represented significant outperformance verses target, while thresholds were set at a level that still represented meaningful year-over-year growth. The actual amount paid to the executive can be greater or less than the target bonus depending on the extent to which these goals are achieved (or exceeded) using straight-line interpolation between target and achievement above or below, as applicable, target amounts. The total payout can range from 0% to 225% of target. For 2021, achievement of the annual bonus was based 50% on attainment of annual revenue growth targets and 50% on attainment of minimum EBITDA margin thresholds. The table below sets forth the relevant revenue growth and EBITDA margin pay-for-performance scales for calendar year 2021.

Based on 2021 performance, as confirmed by the Compensation Committee, the Company achieved revenue growth of 19.3% and EBITDA margin of 50.9%, resulting in 250% achievement with respect to the revenue growth portion of the annual bonus target and 200% achievement with respect to the EBITDA portion of the annual bonus target. As such, Messrs. Olesky and Hult were each entitled to a bonus at 225% of their respective target bonus amounts, as summarized in the table below.

NEOs other than the CEO and President

For calendar year 2021 performance, Ms. Furber was entitled to a guaranteed cash bonus of $700,000 pursuant to the offer letter entered into at the time of her hire, which amount was subject to increase based on her performance, as described further below in the section titled “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Employment Agreements with our Named Executive Officers.” The Committee authorized the Chief Executive Officer to increase Ms. Furber’s bonus in his discretion based on Ms. Furber’s performance and availability of cash from the general employee cash bonus pool (described further below).

Messrs. Bruni and Peterson were each entitled to a cash bonus pursuant to the Company’s general employee cash bonus program for 2021. Each year the Compensation Committee approves the methodology for determining the cash bonus pool for the upcoming year for annual bonus grants to employees, including the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer and President). The bonus pool is increased or decreased based on achievement of specified Company performance goals. For 2021, Company performance was based on revenue growth versus prior year achievement. For achievement above target (set at 10.1% revenue growth for 2021), the bonus pool can increase up to $0.25 per $1.00 of revenue growth. For achievement below budget, the bonus pool is targeted to decrease a minimum of $0.15 per $1.00 of revenue missed. For revenue growth above or below budget, a straight-line interpolation between target and achievement above or below, as applicable, target amounts is used to calculate the bonus amount based on full year revenue growth. The bonus pool does not have a “cap” or “floor” for achievement above or below target. Based on the 2021 performance, the Company exceeded its target with revenue growth of 19.3%.

Each of Messrs. Bruni and Peterson was eligible to receive an annual cash bonus, and Ms. Furber was eligible for an increase in her guaranteed 2021 bonus, from the bonus pool as approved by the Compensation Committee, which authorized Mr. Olesky to make adjustments to such amounts based on his reasonable assessment of the executive’s performance. The allocations of the awards from the bonus pool are based on individual considerations, including individual performance as well as Company performance as a whole. The Company does not allocate bonuses based on set metrics in order to provide for a flexible bonus program designed to reward individual accomplishments. Individual considerations may include, but are not limited to, the executive’s ability to manage expenses, operate his or her business segment within its forecasted budget and, as applicable, achieve forecasted revenue projections. Mr. Olesky recommends an initial proposed bonus allocation for each executive officer which amount is approved by the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee authorizes Mr. Olesky to make such adjustments to those amounts for executive officers as he deems appropriate based on an executive officer’s performance and the remainder of cash left in the general bonus pool. The Company’s overall performance in fiscal 2021 has continued to be strong and exceeded target goals. As noted above, the Company achieved excellent financial performance outcomes, which we believe are strongly linked to the skills and dedication of our executive leadership team, including the NEOs. This resulted in a bonus pool above the target pool. In addition to the Company’s strong financial performance, individual considerations when allocating bonuses for 2021 included, but were not limited to, (i) for Mr. Peterson, his increased responsibilities as a result of his promotion to Chief Technology Officer, (ii) for Mr. Bruni, his management of the Company’s international business, which continues to be an increasingly significant portion of the Company’s overall revenue, and (iii) for Ms. Furber, her strong performance and ability to deliver immediate results following her hire.

In light of their individual performance, each of Messrs. Bruni and Peterson and Ms. Furber received final bonus amounts as reflected in the table below with respect to performance for calendar year 2021. The final bonuses for each individual were approved by the Compensation Committee, or, for Ms. Furber, as set forth in her offer letter, and adjusted by the Chief Executive Officer as described above.

Mr. Warshaw remained entitled to an annual bonus following his transition from the Chief Financial Officer position, with a minimum agreed annual bonus of $1,000,000 for the 2021 fiscal year (which amount is commensurate with amounts paid to Mr. Warshaw in prior years), which is the amount ultimately received by Mr. Warshaw for 2021.

We believe that the above annual cash bonus programs are important incentive tools for motivating achievement of the Company’s goals for the forthcoming fiscal year. We do not provide for guaranteed bonus payouts (with the exception of the cash bonus paid with respect to 2021 service for Ms. Furber for her first year of employment, a portion of which was guaranteed).

Long-Term Equity Incentives

Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

The main objectives of our long-term equity incentive program are to: (1) incentivize our executives to work toward the achievement of both our short- and long-term performance goals, (2) provide competitive compensation opportunities in order to attract and retain key individuals, (3) promote retention of executives through multi-year vesting periods, and (4) create strong alignment with stockholders’ interests by fostering an “ownership mentality” among our executives. We believe these objectives are accomplished through the equity compensation program described below.

Each year the Compensation Committee establishes an aggregate pool for equity awards to be granted to employees for that year. The Compensation Committee then allocates awards under that pool to the Chief Executive Officer and President based on the executive’s performance for the prior year. For all other NEOs, allocations are made based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer based on the executive’s performance for the prior year, and in consideration of their annual bonus amounts for such year, but are subject to Compensation Committee approval in all cases. For 2021, these awards included performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the Tradeweb Markets Inc. 2019 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), the material terms of which are described below.

With respect to the PRSUs, each year the Compensation Committee establishes performance goals for the applicable plan year and the number of PRSUs earned is based on the extent to which the performance goals are achieved (the “Performance Modifier”). The Performance Modifier is based on Company performance for that initial year of grant. Once the Performance Modifier is set and the award is earned, there is a two year additional vesting period, with the final vesting date being on January 1 following the third calendar year in which the award is first outstanding. The Performance Modifier is applied to all vested PRSUs at the time of settlement, which occurs on the first trading day following vesting of the award.

The Performance Modifier for PRSU grants made in calendar year 2021 was based 50% on revenue growth and 50% on EBITDA margin. The table below displays the relevant EBITDA margin and revenue growth goals for calendar year 2021, and potential achievement of a Performance Modifier ranging from 0% to 200%. We believe that EBITDA margin and revenue growth are the most precise and reliable indicators of Company performance, and therefore consider them the most relevant for purposes of establishing performance goals for executive compensation. Our intention is to establish rigorous performance goals for the Company set to motivate the executives and drive performance above budget. The maximum performance goals for PRSUs were set at a level that represented significant outperformance versus budget, while thresholds were set at a level that still represented meaningful year-over-year growth. These performance goals are set based on a one-year period to ensure executives are motivated on a year-to-year basis. The Compensation Committee has determined that it would be difficult to set effective goals more than one year out due to the nature of the Company’s growth and expansion of the business into other markets (including internationally). Setting performance goals each year provides the Company flexibility to alter thresholds each year based on outperformance of budget, to reflect changing needs and growth of the Company, and to ensure executives remain engaged and motivated. While financial performance is measured on a one-year period, awards still continue to vest for a two-year period after financial performance is determined and remain tied to our stock performance over that time period, ensuring that executives’ interests are still aligned with those of our stockholders over the long-term.

Based on 2021 performance, as confirmed by the Compensation Committee, the Company achieved revenue growth of 19.3% and EBITDA margin of 50.9%, resulting in the maximum Performance Modifier of 200% for the 2021 PRSUs.

PRSUs granted to the NEOs are settled exclusively in Shares, less any withholding and employment taxes associated with the settlement of the PRSUs. In addition, the PRSUs accumulate dividend equivalent rights in respect of any dividends paid on Shares (on a one Share to one PRSU basis) from January 1 of the applicable calendar year in which the relevant award was granted through the relevant vesting date. To the extent the PRSUs that gave rise to any dividend equivalent right are forfeited upon a termination, those dividend equivalent rights will be forfeited. Dividend equivalent rights accumulated and not forfeited are added to, and are paid at the same time and in the same form as, payments in respect of the related PRSUs as set forth above.

The RSUs vest annually over three years (1/3 per year) from the date of grant contingent on the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. The RSUs also settle in Shares on the first trading date following the date of vesting and accumulate dividend equivalent rights from the date of grant.

The table below sets forth the PRSUs and RSUs granted to the NEOs in 2021. Executives were awarded a grant value by the Compensation Committee, as described above, which was based on the closing price on the date prior to the date of grant. The PRSUs listed below are based on a 100% Performance Modifier, which was the target achievement at the time of grant.

Sara Furber did not commence employment with the Company until September 2021 and thus did not receive equity incentive awards at the same time as the other NEOs. Rather, pursuant to the offer letter entered into in connection with the commencement of her employment, in consideration of Ms. Furber’s forfeiture of certain deferred long-term incentive compensation provided by her previous employer (“Existing Awards”), the Company agreed to provide Ms. Furber with a special equity grant that was intended to be comparable to her Existing Awards. As such, Ms. Furber received additional equity awards shortly following her commencement of employment with the Company, including a mix of PRSUs and RSUs, as described further below in the section titled “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Employment Agreements with our Named Executive Officers.”

All of the PRSUs and RSUs awarded to our NEOs provide for accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of certain events, such as certain terminations of employment or a change in control, as described below in the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” For a description of PRSUs and RSUs that are currently outstanding under the Equity Plan, see the table titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

We believe that the mix of PRSUs and RSUs granted to our NEOs directly correlates to our compensation objectives and philosophy. The PRSUs encourage strong alignment with stockholders’ interest in growth given that they are directly tied to EBITDA margin and revenue growth, and both the PRSUs and RSUs support retention and stock price alignment by allowing award recipients the opportunity to receive Company stock if they are still employed by us on the date the award vests.

Legacy Equity Plans — Options and PRSUs

Each NEO, other than Ms. Furber, continues to hold outstanding awards under our pre-IPO plans (which were amended and restated at the time of our IPO), including the Amended and Restated Tradeweb Markets Inc. 2018 Share Option Plan (previously the TWM LLC 2018 Share Option Plan) (the “Option Plan”) and the Amended & Restated Tradeweb Markets Inc. PRSU Plan (previously the TWM LLC PRSU Plan) (the “PRSU Plan”).

Each NEO (other than Ms. Furber) was granted options to purchase Shares (the “Options”) under the Option Plan on October 26, 2018. Each Option was granted with the following vesting provisions: (i) 50% of the Option vests ratably over a four-year vesting period based on continued employment (the “Time-Based Portion”), and (ii) 50% of the Option vests based on satisfying certain performance conditions (the “Performance-Based Portion”), as further described below. The Time-Based Portion is currently fully vested for each NEO as a result of accelerated vesting upon the Company’s IPO. For the Performance-Based Portion, (i) 50% is eligible to vest in four equal annual installments based on achievement of Company EBITDA growth targets for 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, and (ii) 50% is eligible to vest in four equal annual installments based on the Company’s achievement of certain revenue growth targets for each of 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 (the “Revenue-Based Portion”). If at least 80% of the applicable revenue growth target is achieved for a given year, the Revenue-Based Portion will vest as to 0%, based on 80% achievement of target, and 100%, based on full achievement of target. For performance achievement between 80% and 100% of target, the Revenue-Based Portion will vest based on straight-line interpolation from 0% to 100%. To the extent the relevant EBITDA targets and revenue targets are not achieved for any calendar year, the portion of the Performance-Based Portion eligible to become vested for such year shall become vested the first time the relevant EBITDA and revenue targets are fully achieved in a later year, if at all.

Vesting of the Performance-Based Portion in respect of calendar year 2021 was based on achievement of a: (A) gross revenue target of $837.786 million (representing 6.6% growth over the 2020 gross revenue target of $785.916) and (B) EBITDA target of $318.545 million (representing 8.2% growth over the 2020 EBITDA target of $294.404). The Company exceeded each of its performance goals for 2021 with an actual gross revenue of $1,076.477 million and $495.666 million EBITDA achievement. The Performance-Based Portion is therefore 100% vested following 2021 performance.

In addition, each NEO (other than Ms. Furber) was granted PRSUs in 2019 under the PRSU Plan which remained outstanding as of the end of fiscal year 2021. The PRSUs granted under the PRSU Plan were subject to terms similar to those granted under the Equity Plan, as described above. Outstanding PRSUs granted under the PRSU Plan vested on January 1, 2022 and are fully settled as of the date hereof.

For more information on the outstanding Options and PRSUs granted under the Option Plan and PRSU Plan, please see the table titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

Retirement Plans

The Company maintains a tax-qualified defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that provides retirement benefits to employees, including matching contributions. Each of Messrs. Olesky, Furber, Warshaw, Hult and Peterson were eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same terms as other participating employees in 2021. Mr. Bruni is eligible to participate in the Company’s contributory pension scheme for employees located in Europe on the same terms as other participating employees.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

The Company provides the NEOs with perquisites and other personal benefits, or an allowance for certain perquisites, that it believes are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program to better enable the Company to attract and retain key individuals. Such perquisites and benefits include (i) financial planning services, (ii) executive life insurance, (iii) group life insurance, (iv) executive long-term disability insurance, (v) excess liability insurance, and (vi) reimbursement for annual club membership dues.

Clawbacks

The Company maintains a clawback policy which applies to all executive officers (including the NEOs), certain senior managers, and other designated employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose

of the policy is to create and maintain a culture that emphasizes integrity and accountability and that reinforces the Company’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. The policy provides that, in the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement of its financial statements, the Company will make a reasonable attempt to recover the portion of the incentive compensation that was improperly paid to the officer or other employee during the three most recently completed fiscal years based on the erroneous data. Separately, if it is determined that an officer or other employee covered by the policy has intentionally engaged in misconduct, fraud or other illegal conduct, which contributed to the circumstances requiring an accounting restatement, and the Compensation Committee determines it would be appropriate to seek recovery under the policy, the Company will make a reasonable attempt to recover part or all of the incentive compensation (as described in the policy) that was paid to the relevant officer or other employee during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

Securities Trading Policy

To ensure alignment of the interests of our stockholders and executive officers, including our NEOs, as well as compliance with applicable securities laws, the Company’s Securities Trading Policy (i) prohibits all employees from engaging in transactions involving the Company’s stock based on material non-public information or communicating material non-public information to any person who uses that information to purchase or sell Company securities, and (ii) requires directors, executive officers (including the NEOs) and certain other designated employees (as identified in the Securities Trading Policy) to preclear any trading in Company securities, whether or not during an open trade window (except that such policies shall not apply to the exercise of options not involving a market sale to generate cash to pay the exercise price, the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards or transactions in accordance with a previously established trading plan that meets SEC requirements). In addition, as part of our Securities Trading Policy, (i) directors, officers or employees and certain other covered persons (as identified in the Securities Trading Policy), whether or not he or she possesses material non-public information, may not trade in options, warrants, puts, calls or similar instruments on the Company’s securities or engage in short shares, (ii) no directors, officers or employees may engage in any transactions (including variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities, and (iii) no directors, officers or employees, whether or not in possession of material non-public information, may purchase the Company’s securities on margin, or borrow against any account in which the Company’s securities are held, or pledge the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan, without first obtaining pre-clearance.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee considers tax and accounting implications in its executive compensation determinations, although in some cases, other important considerations may outweigh tax or accounting considerations, and the Compensation Committee maintains the flexibility to compensate its officers in accordance with the Company’s compensation philosophy.

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Section 162(m)”), a publicly held corporation generally is limited to a $1 million annual tax deduction for compensation paid to each of its “covered employees.” The Company has historically taken the position that, as a result of its corporate structure, the deduction limitation imposed by Section 162(m) does not apply to its employees who are employed by TWM LLC or its subsidiaries. However, on December 18, 2020, the Treasury Department released final regulations under Section 162(m) (the “Final Regulations”) that provide that, generally, subject to certain exceptions, when a publicly held corporation (such as the Company) holds a partnership interest (such as our interest in TWM LLC), the corporation must take into account its distributive share of the partnership’s deduction for compensation paid to covered employees of the corporation. These new rules do not apply to compensation that is “grandfathered” under special transition rules for compensation paid in 2020 or that is paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on December 20, 2019, which is not materially modified or renewed or cancelable by the company after that date. Separately, companies that had an IPO prior to December 2019 can rely on an exception to Section 162(m) for newly public companies (the “Transition Rule”).

By virtue of the Final Regulations, our equity awards granted through 2019 will qualify as grandfathered awards, but compensation related to equity awards granted after 2019 and related to future equity awards, along with cash compensation starting in December 2022 (as a result of the Transition Rule), paid to those of our employees considered “covered employees” will be subject to the compensation deduction limitations under Section 162(m). Going forward, while it is only one of many factors, the Compensation Committee will consider the impact of Section 162(m) on its compensation arrangements, and it is anticipated that the Compensation Committee will, in its discretion and when it deems appropriate, enter into compensation arrangements with those employees considered “covered employees” under which payments may not be fully deductible under Section 162(m).

Compensation Committee Report

We, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, reviewed and had the opportunity to discuss with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above and, based upon our review, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this report.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to the NEOs that is attributable to services performed during fiscal years 2019, 2020, and 2021, as required.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table summarizes the awards granted to each of the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.